03/11/10 0:00:47 ekacnet: still no idea what you are talking about, sorry, cant find any mail mentioning TTT 03/11/10 0:02:05 gd: ah because it wasn't on the list 03/11/10 0:02:12 Signoff: Rickson- (Quit: Ex-Chat) 03/11/10 0:02:19 do you think I can forward it to you ? 03/11/10 0:04:57 Signoff: bradh_ (Remote host closed the connection) 03/11/10 0:05:29 bradh_ (~bradh@ppp115-205.static.internode.on.net) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 0:10:54 gd - you still around ? 03/11/10 0:15:10 wanon: yep 03/11/10 0:50:17 Signoff: lagarcia (Remote host closed the connection) 03/11/10 1:04:30 idra: where did things to to with sahlberg's DNS and CLDAP work? 03/11/10 1:04:44 did you guys ever get the code updated? 03/11/10 1:06:08 no 03/11/10 1:06:21 ronny seem too busy 03/11/10 1:06:39 and the code was quite tied to winbindd and used the old composite stuff 03/11/10 1:06:41 yeah, he is a very busy man - that's why this didn't go anywhere 03/11/10 1:07:03 and I have been busy too, things keep coming my way 03/11/10 1:07:09 yeah... 03/11/10 1:07:12 however atm I may not need it 03/11/10 1:07:12 irda i will look into it next week when i am home again 03/11/10 1:07:23 sahlberg, sure not pushing you 03/11/10 1:07:30 I may have found a way around for now 03/11/10 1:07:42 that's why I haven't worked on it yet 03/11/10 1:08:00 you should be able to use DNS, and use the connect_multi code to get a similar effect 03/11/10 1:08:09 (only making a connection to the first host to respond) 03/11/10 1:08:58 at the time I needed to be sure I was connecting to a PDC 03/11/10 1:09:35 but I decide to lower my requests by solving first the trust problem by creating the trusts on each side and only do validation later 03/11/10 1:09:47 that code path looks much simpler and more promising for a start 03/11/10 1:09:57 requires a lot less calls 03/11/10 1:10:21 yeah 03/11/10 1:10:44 although there is one netlogon call that still look nasty and it also seem to imply windows expect the other server to have a schannel cache for all connections both incoming and outgoing 03/11/10 1:10:57 it seem to request information on a currently outgoing schannel connection 03/11/10 1:11:09 looking to see if that info can simply be faked for now 03/11/10 1:11:34 otherwise we are back to require making an outbound connection + keeping track of it 03/11/10 1:11:35 I'm intrigued - I look forward to seeing the patches 03/11/10 1:12:10 abartlet, I will try to avoid doing anything not strictly required to make windows accept us as a trusted realm 03/11/10 1:12:26 so if I can avoid doing that I will even if it is not perfect 03/11/10 1:12:33 your worried about ending down a rathole? 03/11/10 1:12:38 yep 03/11/10 1:12:46 but ratholes are so fun! 03/11/10 1:12:55 I need some answers before I get down implementing stuff 03/11/10 1:12:55 we can spend days - weeks - months down them! 03/11/10 1:13:15 (like extended DNs. Now that rathole almost cost me my job! :-) 03/11/10 1:13:16 abartlet, this is one that stinks of months 03/11/10 1:13:40 :-) 03/11/10 1:19:34 Signoff: mimir (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) 03/11/10 1:29:01 Signoff: coffeedude (Quit: Leaving) 03/11/10 1:43:04 Signoff: sahlberg (Remote host closed the connection) 03/11/10 2:03:50 Signoff: bradh_ (Remote host closed the connection) 03/11/10 2:04:21 bradh_ (~bradh@ppp115-205.static.internode.on.net) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 2:06:29 _gaffe (~nagloc@pool-71-254-86-214.lyncva.east.verizon.net) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 2:10:19 Signoff: [machine]_ (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) 03/11/10 2:11:16 [machine] (~timb@kelowna.ca.nth-dimension.org.uk) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 2:57:25 Signoff: bradh_ (Remote host closed the connection) 03/11/10 2:57:57 bradh_ (~bradh@ppp115-205.static.internode.on.net) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 4:18:57 Signoff: sdann (Write error: Broken pipe) 03/11/10 4:19:13 sdann (~sdanneman@gw-105.extranet.sea01.isilon.com) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 4:29:06 Signoff: _mavrick61 (Remote host closed the connection) 03/11/10 4:30:10 _mavrick61 (~mavrick61@213.132.111.1) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 4:34:10 Signoff: kukks (Quit: Going home ...) 03/11/10 4:37:08 lagarcia (~lagarcia@12.157.249.2) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 4:46:40 bradh_ is now known as bradh 03/11/10 4:58:51 Signoff: bradh (Remote host closed the connection) 03/11/10 4:59:15 bradh (~bradh@ppp115-205.static.internode.on.net) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 5:33:09 jays (~jay@nat/novell/x-ucebjeailrqawlaf) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 5:51:28 sahlberg (~sahlberg@12-187-218-26.att-inc.com) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 6:29:32 Signoff: abartlet (Quit: Client exiting) 03/11/10 7:07:53 Signoff: bradh (Remote host closed the connection) 03/11/10 7:08:20 bradh (~bradh@ppp115-205.static.internode.on.net) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 7:31:24 anubhavrocks (~anubhav@114.143.90.41) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 8:29:00 ab[out] is now known as ab 03/11/10 8:31:21 sendro (~sendro@d114-78-195-241.meb801.vic.optusnet.com.au) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 8:56:35 sahlberg has left channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 9:07:44 SanBadger (~kvirc@193.175.27.57) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 9:07:47 hi * 03/11/10 9:13:28 kinkie (~kinkie-ir@eu.squid-cache.org) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 9:15:00 Signoff: bradh (Read error: Connection reset by peer) 03/11/10 9:15:27 bradh (~bradh@ppp115-205.static.internode.on.net) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 9:29:50 kamenim (~kamenim@mail.sofia.postpath.com) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 9:40:11 Signoff: sendro (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) 03/11/10 9:52:20 Signoff: kinkie (Quit: $HOME, sweet $HOME) 03/11/10 10:25:24 morning 03/11/10 10:25:57 hi 03/11/10 10:26:58 Signoff: bradh (Read error: Connection reset by peer) 03/11/10 10:49:32 Rickson- (~asd@h-124-2.A213.corp.bahnhof.se) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 11:16:50 nivanova (~nivanova@mail.sofia.postpath.com) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 11:23:48 Signoff: jays (Read error: Operation timed out) 03/11/10 11:31:04 mimir (~rafal__@static-87-105-185-84.ssp.dialog.net.pl) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 12:26:31 kukks (~Guenter@p57A0830A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 12:58:30 hi all 03/11/10 12:58:47 does anybody manage to solve this error: "Compiling dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c" 03/11/10 12:58:57 dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c: In function 'replmd_replPropertyMetaDataCtr1_sort': 03/11/10 12:58:58 dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c:606: error: implicit declaration of function 'LDB_TYPESAFE_QSORT' 03/11/10 12:59:11 just pull the latest git version 03/11/10 12:59:14 of samba4 03/11/10 12:59:36 and when doing compile I got this error 03/11/10 13:00:13 Using external popt: yes 03/11/10 13:00:13 Using external talloc: yes 03/11/10 13:00:13 Using external tdb: yes 03/11/10 13:00:13 Using external tevent: yes 03/11/10 13:00:13 Using external ldb: yes 03/11/10 13:00:14 Using external heimdal: no 03/11/10 13:00:28 Is it beacuse I'm using the internal heimdal? 03/11/10 13:00:33 I'm runing debian 03/11/10 13:01:16 sassyn: last time I asked it's still impossible not to use the internal heimdal, do that should be ok 03/11/10 13:01:59 ewoud, So u sayin that I shoudl use external heimdal in the configure command? 03/11/10 13:02:31 sassyn: no, I'm saying that there are still unmerged patches in the internal heimdal which are not yet available in the external heimdal 03/11/10 13:03:05 Ok, so I should i solve the compilation? 03/11/10 13:03:23 I think your problem might be the external ldb 03/11/10 13:03:49 there is no real ldb package available, though jelmer has made one on debian 03/11/10 13:03:54 but that might be outdated 03/11/10 13:04:34 jelmer, did ship ldb, popt, talloc, tdb and tevent in debain 03/11/10 13:04:45 sassyn: run git clean -f -x 03/11/10 13:04:47 and try again 03/11/10 13:04:51 I have rebuild these pkg for debain lenny 03/11/10 13:05:30 the problem howerver that there is still some issue with compaling heimdal-1.4.0 03/11/10 13:05:32 the whole reason there is no ldb release yet, is that it's still a fast moving target so my first guess is that your ldb is older than samba 4 wants it 03/11/10 13:05:43 OK 03/11/10 13:05:53 so basicly u say that don't use any external tools 03/11/10 13:05:59 use samba4 own tools 03/11/10 13:06:04 no, the other ones should be fine 03/11/10 13:07:38 ok, let's give it a try. since jelmer did put in the control file in debian to use the external libarary. I just wanted to build the deb file to be compatiable to the upcoming version of debain 03/11/10 13:07:47 and not only have it in the experminatl 03/11/10 13:08:08 i have use samba4 since alpha4 and alpha10 seems so cool and stable 03/11/10 13:08:20 that I think it is ready for a production allready! 03/11/10 13:12:35 still working ..... make seems good now 03/11/10 13:16:56 what is a vampired DC? 03/11/10 13:17:42 ewoud, gladiac - still compling :-) 03/11/10 13:21:00 segfault_ (~segfault@fsckyou.org) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 13:21:02 hi 03/11/10 13:21:18 segfault_, hi 03/11/10 13:21:19 anyone with good knowledge about ldapsam/account rights? 03/11/10 13:21:33 segfault_, what do u mean? 03/11/10 13:21:58 i mean the way they are implemented 03/11/10 13:22:09 sassyn: vampire means sucking up another domain if I read http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/ntmigration.html#ch8-migration correctly 03/11/10 13:22:17 i'd like to know if a problem i'm having is a feature or a bug. 03/11/10 13:22:20 ewoud, gladiac - compiled fine - seem to run 03/11/10 13:24:20 idra, tridge, jmcd, metze? 03/11/10 13:25:30 vl? 03/11/10 13:26:17 Signoff: anubhavrocks (Quit: Leaving) 03/11/10 13:26:22 segfault_: pong 03/11/10 13:26:55 thanks, 03/11/10 13:27:44 the problem is: if the user is part of the SeMachineAccountPrivilege right, he is able to change user accounts and groups also 03/11/10 13:27:54 ekacnet: ping 03/11/10 13:28:27 segfault_: Sorry to defer you, but can you file a bug at bugzilla.samba.org? This should not be the case. 03/11/10 13:28:28 is that a feature (like coming from NT specs), or a bug in my current version? 03/11/10 13:28:54 sure, id just like to have an initial idea 03/11/10 13:29:17 This would be a problem in rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c 03/11/10 13:38:01 Bug 7238 Submitted 03/11/10 13:38:03 segfault_: Bug https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7238 maj, P3, ---, samba-bugs@samba.org, NEW, Users with SeMachineAccountPrivilege right are able to change users and groups accounts 03/11/10 13:38:04 thanks. 03/11/10 13:38:50 Signoff: Rickson- (Quit: Lämnar) 03/11/10 14:07:58 hi metze, 03/11/10 14:16:09 What is the status of samba4? with printing? 03/11/10 14:16:25 I still us samba3 for printing, with winbind. 03/11/10 14:16:34 but winbind with samba4 seems to make trouble 03/11/10 14:16:44 1. I saw emails about getent groups 03/11/10 14:17:03 2. it takes a lot of time to resolve getent password from samba4 AD 03/11/10 14:17:23 Same configuration on windows 2003/2008R2 have no problems. 03/11/10 14:17:56 I use rfc2307 03/11/10 14:17:59 any idea? 03/11/10 14:21:09 samba4 doesn't do printing 03/11/10 14:21:38 we're currently improving the s3 print server 03/11/10 14:21:58 and that will be the print server for the future 03/11/10 14:25:23 metze: pong 03/11/10 14:29:51 ekacnet: have you tested with a system libiniparser? 03/11/10 14:30:03 metze, I see 03/11/10 14:30:15 but what about the winbind with samba4? 03/11/10 14:30:17 metze: no sorry 03/11/10 14:30:59 sassyn: depends from what you expect :-) 03/11/10 14:31:12 ekacnet, well - it goes like this 03/11/10 14:31:21 samba4 as AD works great - 100 user 03/11/10 14:31:25 seems just fine! 03/11/10 14:31:41 but one of the server runing samba3 as a print and file server 03/11/10 14:31:44 using cups 03/11/10 14:32:01 the user in the active direcoty has rfc2307 attributes configure 03/11/10 14:32:18 since all of them are loging to a redhat machine 03/11/10 14:32:23 sassyn: there are patches to make pam_winbind works and to improve also nsswtich stuff (so that id ad_user gives more information) 03/11/10 14:32:24 using kerberos and nss_ldap 03/11/10 14:32:36 now, in the samba3 server 03/11/10 14:33:11 when doing getent passwd, it takes a lot of time to bind to the AD. while with the same configuartion this works very fast on windows. so i guess there is some issue 03/11/10 14:33:28 sassyn: then it's a bug 03/11/10 14:33:55 I would be happy to figure out what is worng, but I need some guidelines here 03/11/10 14:34:01 metze, bug in samba3? 03/11/10 14:34:04 or 4? 03/11/10 14:34:09 sassyn: maybe both 03/11/10 14:34:21 sassyn: first do a capture the network traffic 03/11/10 14:34:29 of the working setup 03/11/10 14:34:36 and the non-working setup 03/11/10 14:34:38 I saw u and abalert have wrote this week some email and patches 03/11/10 14:34:46 and then compare them 03/11/10 14:35:30 it seems something with the kerberos entriy. the samba3 server - can't something find himself as part of the domain due to security issues. which after restarting winbind and samba - it can. 03/11/10 14:35:48 capture like in tcpdump? 03/11/10 14:35:52 yep 03/11/10 14:35:57 tcpdump -s0 03/11/10 14:36:06 OK 03/11/10 14:36:13 I will give it a try 03/11/10 14:36:20 I just compling the new version of samba4 03/11/10 14:36:22 so I will see 03/11/10 14:36:32 and also level 10 logs from s3 in both cases 03/11/10 14:36:41 and s4 in case its the ad dc 03/11/10 14:36:51 with the new version; maybe I could drop the bug before alpha12 03/11/10 14:36:53 OK 03/11/10 14:37:06 sassyn: also make sure you use master for s3 and s4 03/11/10 14:37:37 u mean master under the git? 03/11/10 14:38:31 I'm not sure it is a samba3 bug - since on samba3 - version 3.4.0-3ubuntu5.4 under ubuntu that seems to work just fine with windows 2003R2/2008R2. 03/11/10 14:38:50 So, I think I shoud be more focus on samba4. 03/11/10 14:40:13 and one more thing - the replication with other samba4 or windows AD - is working amazing! 03/11/10 14:40:35 :-) great job everyone ! 03/11/10 14:47:46 Rickson- (~Rickson-@h-124-2.A213.corp.bahnhof.se) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 15:00:30 Signoff: Rickson- () 03/11/10 15:00:46 ambi_ (~ambi@nat/ibm/x-gzomvbrhpcedimoj) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 15:10:21 Rickson- (~Rickson-@h-124-2.A213.corp.bahnhof.se) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 15:22:32 ekacnet 03/11/10 15:29:23 [1]sassyn (~sassyn@77.124.84.57) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 15:29:37 Signoff: lagarcia (Remote host closed the connection) 03/11/10 15:31:36 Signoff: sassyn (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) 03/11/10 15:31:37 [1]sassyn is now known as sassyn 03/11/10 16:19:55 Signoff: Rickson- () 03/11/10 16:28:37 jays (~jay@122.167.179.79) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 16:32:08 sahlberg (~sahlberg@32.97.110.52) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 16:36:21 lagarcia (~lagarcia@32.97.110.53) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 16:45:39 lagarcia_ (~lagarcia@32.97.110.53) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 16:49:25 Signoff: lagarcia (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) 03/11/10 16:52:39 Signoff: mimir (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) 03/11/10 17:04:09 Signoff: gladiac (Quit: Shutting down C3PO.) 03/11/10 17:04:50 Signoff: jays (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) 03/11/10 17:11:31 gladiac (~asn@milliways.cynapses.org) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 17:27:45 Signoff: lagarcia_ (Remote host closed the connection) 03/11/10 17:47:00 Signoff: SanBadger (Quit: Leaving...) 03/11/10 17:49:38 Signoff: kamenim (Quit: Miranda IM! Smaller, Faster, Easier. http://miranda-im.org) 03/11/10 17:52:17 ab is now known as ab[out] 03/11/10 17:56:28 Signoff: nivanova (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.85 [Firefox 3.5.8/20100216105410]) 03/11/10 18:16:19 ccrisan (~ccrisan@2001:660:7301:4168:216:d4ff:fe3f:a63) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 18:21:31 lagarcia (~lagarcia@32.97.110.53) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 18:40:24 mimir (~rafal__@static-87-105-185-84.ssp.dialog.net.pl) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 18:56:43 Signoff: lagarcia (Remote host closed the connection) 03/11/10 19:19:19 Blinkz (~Blinkz@h156n2fls32o256.telia.com) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 19:21:17 idra, ewoud, etc: Thanks for helping out last night, with the pdbedit things. 03/11/10 19:22:06 pdbedit -L -w works nicely as its got the same formatting as the old smbpasswd file format. 03/11/10 19:22:40 I have some questions regarding the functionality though... 03/11/10 19:22:53 pdbedit -L -w 03/11/10 19:22:54 fooaXB:520:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:97EE5397CE438C81581B41D9667F8B75:[U ]:LCT-4B990DF5: 03/11/10 19:22:54 smbguest:501:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:[U ]:LCT-00000000: 03/11/10 19:23:55 if i remove and add most any user itll fill in the password field (last XXX field). When adding user smbguest it wont be filled in and cannot be changed. 03/11/10 19:24:59 Is that because its listed in the smbusers file ? 03/11/10 19:25:55 Worked all day and night. Converted the gadmin app to use pdbedit :) 03/11/10 19:28:15 A few requests as follows for the pdbedit program: Also add the (-d disable user) (-e enable user) (-n set no password). 03/11/10 19:28:30 That would be awesome. 03/11/10 19:28:44 smbpasswd had those options. 03/11/10 19:33:54 Signoff: ambi_ (Quit: Leaving.) 03/11/10 19:36:13 Or maybe someone knows how to do those things with the current pdbedit ? 03/11/10 19:36:54 Signoff: torsti76 (Quit: Leaving.) 03/11/10 19:40:53 smbpasswd is still used to add/disable/whatever users 03/11/10 19:42:33 Yeah, but im thinking it can be replaced by pdbedit totally. 03/11/10 19:42:48 Seems to be headed that a way. 03/11/10 19:42:56 anubhavrocks (~anubhav@114.143.86.12) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 19:43:08 I very much doubt that 03/11/10 19:43:14 How come ? 03/11/10 19:44:24 pdbedit is specific to a specific database type. smbpasswd can be made to use whatever backend is selected in smb.conf 03/11/10 19:47:26 kblin: are you aware that smbpasswd -x UserName will also remove your system users (It seems to be a new thing) 03/11/10 19:48:06 I wrote that down as "DANGER DANGER DANGER" in the changelog :) 03/11/10 19:48:49 So pdbedit is clearly a better program to use atm. 03/11/10 19:49:29 Happens on Fedora12. 03/11/10 19:49:45 Can you check it on your box =? 03/11/10 19:49:58 I almost forgot to report that. 03/11/10 19:51:19 that sounds odd 03/11/10 19:51:22 Ill paste a whole bunch of lines... I hope you see why im doing this... 03/11/10 19:51:31 cat /etc/passwd | grep crappy1 03/11/10 19:51:32 crappy1:x:506:505:Crappy1:/dev/null:/dev/null 03/11/10 19:51:32 [root@localhost src]# 03/11/10 19:51:40 [root@localhost src]# smbpasswd -x crappy1 03/11/10 19:51:41 Deleted user crappy1. 03/11/10 19:51:41 [root@localhost src]# 03/11/10 19:51:47 [root@localhost src]# cat /etc/passwd | grep crappy1 03/11/10 19:51:48 [root@localhost src]# 03/11/10 19:51:56 See ? 03/11/10 19:52:06 have you set a delete user script? 03/11/10 19:52:11 yes 03/11/10 19:52:16 Ive had that for years 03/11/10 19:52:18 there we go 03/11/10 19:52:29 then you ask samba to delete the user for you 03/11/10 19:52:30 Its a new behaviour 03/11/10 19:52:35 no 03/11/10 19:52:39 ? 03/11/10 19:52:58 Ive had it since 2000 and it never deleted my system users 03/11/10 19:53:04 until now 03/11/10 19:54:46 ok, I haven't tried on this machine, but my 8.04 ubuntu ships a manpage that claims that smbpasswd connects to samba via RPC 03/11/10 19:55:10 and man smb.conf claims that the delete user script is run when a user is deleted via rpc 03/11/10 19:55:26 kblin: Nope, that box wont delete your system users when only asked to delete samba users 03/11/10 19:55:39 This is local 03/11/10 19:55:58 ok, so it's new behaviour 03/11/10 19:56:00 [1]sassyn (~sassyn@77.124.84.57) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 19:56:07 but it's what I'd have expected in the first place 03/11/10 19:56:12 I was very suprised to see my system accounts dissapear 03/11/10 19:56:19 LOL!!! 03/11/10 19:56:39 You expect things to change and become unusable for most users then ? 03/11/10 19:57:00 seriously, if I set a delete user script and delete a user, I'd expect that user to be gone 03/11/10 19:57:20 smbpasswd - Manage samba users ---- Woops, your system users where deleted, SORRY!!! :) 03/11/10 19:57:35 Not locally 03/11/10 19:58:02 smbpasswd doesn't 03/11/10 19:58:07 smbd does 03/11/10 19:58:22 because you told it to by setting a "delete user script" 03/11/10 19:58:31 Signoff: sassyn (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) 03/11/10 19:58:31 [1]sassyn is now known as sassyn 03/11/10 19:58:44 NO, you dont have to have smbd started at all, YOUR SYSTEM ACCOUNTS WILL BE GONE !!! :( 03/11/10 19:58:53 hm? 03/11/10 19:59:00 kblin: stop talking please 03/11/10 19:59:06 .! 03/11/10 20:00:13 Signoff: segfault_ (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) 03/11/10 20:00:21 if you just want to be rude, why don't you go do that on #flood? 03/11/10 20:00:28 DANGER DANGER DANGER !!! kblin is in da house! :) 03/11/10 20:02:40 Ill check this on my Ubuntu 9.10 as well. 03/11/10 20:02:45 re iaw 03/11/10 20:05:02 And yes, it deletes the system users there as well as on Fedora12 03/11/10 20:11:35 Attribute the bug curtesy of "Dark Vejdur Monkeys of Doom" :) 03/11/10 20:13:17 I wonder if it will even delete the root user / That would be soo microsofty. 03/11/10 20:16:47 Whats good is that it doesnt remove the system users home directory, however bad it may be... all permission settings etc GONE! 03/11/10 20:16:49 Hehe 03/11/10 20:18:03 I dont dare to test "smbpasswd -x root". That would be hiddeously evil. 03/11/10 20:29:43 diegobestlinux (~diegobest@201.91.215.132) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 20:34:30 nivanova_ (~nivanova@92.247.230.241) has joined channel #samba-technical 03/11/10 20:58:26 kblin, pdbedit is not specific to any database 03/11/10 21:00:58 yeah, we added this one for consistency reasons (f48e39540c9767e9077e7534a6d410b4ce597c86) 03/11/10 21:04:10 idra: oh, ok 03/11/10 21:04:34 jelmer: ping